Discussion:
Moderator needed on this group
(too old to reply)
UkJay
2008-04-17 06:58:09 UTC
Permalink
This ng needs moderator so that users can use it again without all
the
needless junk on it.

Jeff, if you need help just ask!

Jay
Peter Constantine
2008-04-17 17:01:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by UkJay
This ng needs moderator so that users can use it again without all
the needless junk on it.
This group does not have sufficient traffic to warrant moderation...
even if that were possible - and on Usenet I don't think it is.

Perhaps a moderated group somewhere else - such as on Yahoo Groups -
would be the solution for those who feel that uk.local.north-staffs is
overwhelmed by too many trolls and spammers (...and for those who can't
set up killfiles).


x

["A censor is a man who knows more than he
thinks you ought to." - Granville Hicks]
Zhang DaWei
2008-04-17 18:03:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Constantine
[...]
This group does not have sufficient traffic to warrant moderation...
even if that were possible - and on Usenet I don't think it is.
It is possible to have moderated groups on usenet, and there are a
reasonable number already in the uk. hierarchy. See http://xrl.in/374
for details of how they can be proposed, etc. The full address is:

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.net.news.announce/browse_thread/thread/2fd153ce7b1b4907/df73b4e4e7352df2?lnk=st

HTH
--
Zhang Dawei: Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Please use the Reply-To
field. The email address given there is guaranteed to
work for two weeks from the date of this message.
Peter Constantine
2008-04-17 18:13:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zhang DaWei
It is possible to have moderated groups on usenet, and there are a
reasonable number already in the uk. hierarchy. See http://xrl.in/374
for details of how they can be proposed, etc.
That was kind of what I was getting at... THIS group cannot be
moderated. It could only be done by setting up a completely new group.


x
Geoff Berrow
2008-04-17 18:55:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Constantine
Post by Zhang DaWei
It is possible to have moderated groups on usenet, and there are a
reasonable number already in the uk. hierarchy. See http://xrl.in/374
for details of how they can be proposed, etc.
That was kind of what I was getting at... THIS group cannot be
moderated. It could only be done by setting up a completely new group.
Post by Zhang DaWei
It is possible to have moderated groups on usenet, and there are a
reasonable number already in the uk. hierarchy. See http://xrl.in/374
for details of how they can be proposed, etc.
That was kind of what I was getting at... THIS group cannot be
moderated. It could only be done by setting up a completely new group.
It is /possible/ but it's also a seriously bad idea. Usenet does not
reside on a single server, (though Google groups does its damndest to
make it look that way) but on thousands of servers throughout the world.
To make the change would involve all those servers agreeing to comply.

I don't see masses of spam but I read the group via NIN and I now know
that Jay reads it via Google. So that's probably the reason.

Frankly I don't se how anyone can read a busy group via Google but I
suppose it's doable for this one.

You can't beat a good feed and a good news client.

By the way both Mark Goodge and I are both members of the UK Usenet
Committee, FWIW
--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
Jim
2008-04-22 18:03:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Constantine
Post by UkJay
This ng needs moderator so that users can use it again without all
the needless junk on it.
This group does not have sufficient traffic to warrant moderation...
even if that were possible - and on Usenet I don't think it is.
I see! Then what about uk.local.yorkshire.moderated??
That is a usenet ng and it is moderated!
Post by Peter Constantine
Perhaps a moderated group somewhere else - such as on Yahoo Groups -
would be the solution for those who feel that uk.local.north-staffs is
overwhelmed by too many trolls and spammers (...and for those who can't
set up killfiles).
It's empty most of the time. No one posts here.

Get a life mate.
------------------------>DISCLAIMER<------------------------

The views expressed in this post are not those of the author.
Indeed they may not be held by any right thinking person.
Should you be moved to engage with the ideas expressed
you would be best advised to consult a very good
practicing Psychiatrist should such a thing exist.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AW Barton
2008-04-19 20:08:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by UkJay
This ng needs moderator so that users can use it again without all
the
needless junk on it.
Jeff, if you need help just ask!
Jay
You cannot convert an unmoderated group into a moderated one, that is not
possible (thank goodness).
Mark Goodge
2008-04-19 20:53:09 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:08:43 +0100, AW Barton put finger to keyboard
Post by AW Barton
Post by UkJay
This ng needs moderator so that users can use it again without all
the
needless junk on it.
Jeff, if you need help just ask!
Jay
You cannot convert an unmoderated group into a moderated one, that is not
possible (thank goodness).
You can, and it has previously been done in uk.*. There is, however, a
general presumption against doing so as it can be hard to ensure that
all the servers which carry the group update the status.

Mark
--
Pointless waffle (again) at http://mark.x.tc
"I've got too much life running through my veins going to waste"
Loading...